rrrabuyvsvsveytfazersurdwarubawvev0% Interest for 36 Months! Learn more »
(800) 222-4700
  • Español: (800) 222-4701
Cart
July 4 Financing

Sweetwater Forums [Archived]

After 15 years of great discussions, the Sweetwater Forums are now closed and preserved as a "read-only" resource. For discussions about current gear, check us out on Facebook, YouTube, inSync, and our Knowledge Base.

AT 4040 vs. 4050

mark4man

Does the AT 4040 utilize the same 2-micron gold diaphragm as the 4050? (& the same transformerless solid-state circuitry?) Is the only difference between the two the added pickup patterns on the 4050?
Would the 4040 sound the same as the 4050 in a cardioid pattern?
Or is the 4050 better quality all the way around?
Still looking for a quality studio LDC vocal mic; & have narrowed my search down to Audio Technica. I have tested the 4040 with my voice, but certain tracking types are telling me to go with the 4050...but is the only difference I'm seeing the added pickup patterns on the 4050? Someone else told me the 4050 is a better LDC mic for "digital" recording...but, then again...I thought that's what we all do.
Please help.
Thanks,
mark4man
November 6, 2004 @01:48am
michaelhoddy

They sound different, no question. Some things sound better with the 4040, some with the 4050. I don't really find one to be "better" than the other, it just depends on what the application is.
The 4050 sounds more neutral to me, a little less bright, and a little more scooped out in the mids.
November 6, 2004 @03:26am
danhazer

I like them both, too. But for breathy vocals I prefer the 4040 (and maybe even vocals, overall - really depends on the application). Most often I use the 4050.
November 8, 2004 @04:24pm
mark4man

Mike & Dan,
Forgot to come back & thank you guys.
Thanks.
Going with the 4050. Can't hear it first, tho...so I hope it's the right choice.
mark4man
November 11, 2004 @01:27am