Sweetwater offers more ways to pay than any other music retailer. Learn more »
Cart (800) 222-4700 Español (800) 222-4701
dbx 376 ReviewsSweetwater Advice
Nick Church
Are you looking for a "Money channel" for live or project studio work? This dbx 376 tube channel strip is worth every dollar of your money! It gives you a tube input section that is quiet enough for most vocal or instrument applications in the home studio arena, and definitely more than good enough for live work. The EQ and dynamics sections have carefully chosen parameters available on a well-laid-out and easy-to-use front panel, the metering choices being particularly good. For studio use the A/D conversion is a big improvement over those found in a lot of budget home studio interfaces, with the adjustable dither and noise shaping options at up to 24-bit/96kHz. A number of my customers have thanked me for recommending this unit to them, for live and studio situations, and it's easy to hear why. Do yourself a favor and put this at the top of your list for an affordable channel strip!
Customer Reviewsfrom Nashville April 18, 2011 Music Background: Sound Engineer Live & Recording Avalon Killer!!!This is one of my favorite pieces of gear. I use it for live vox as well as a $$ channel for recording. You would have to spend 1-2 K to beat it. It has the most bang for the buck. Presonus is junk. Prosumer crap. Dbx is rugged enough to take on the road as well as detailed enough for the studio.from Salt Lake City December 5, 2008 Music Background: long time semi-pro and current student in the field The 376 vs. EurekaI have owned both a PreSonus and DBX 376 for several years. I use the 376 more because of it's simple design. It is very easy to dial in the sound desired. The LED indicators are also very easy and useful. I don't have time for the evasive metering of the Eureka. I typically use this preamp for vocals, but I have also used it for guitar. The DBX is a great value in this price range for vocals. The sound tends to be warm rather than crisp. If you intend to use this preamp more for instruments, I might recommend the Eureka. Especially in a 'set it and forget it' situation.from Los Angeles, CA October 27, 2007 Music Background: Composer, Engineer Good Channel Strip, but Consider the Presonus EurekaI looked carefully for a channel strip in the $500 price-range, and the dbx 376 and the Presonus Eureka were the two I came up with. They offer similar features: Preamp, EQ, Comp/Limiting. The dbx comes standard with a digital output; the Eureka offers this extra at a price. I recorded lots of good stuff with the 376, but head to head, I just liked the PreSonus more -- it had more of what I wanted to hear. Both units are little bit hard to steer with touchy knobs, but the Eureka was a bit easier to set, although on the Eureka I found it harder to catch clips (the dbx does offer easy to read LEDs instead of the old school VU meter) and the Eureka's knobs are pretty tiny and catch a bit of glare which makes them very difficult to read.The dbx 376 is nothing to be ashamed of, but if you don't need the digital output, the Eureka is the better sounding unit in my opinion. from Tampa, FL May 6, 2012 Music Background: Professional Full time Recording Engineer/Producer Good overalla few years ago I did a pretty serious workover of this preamp, along with some MOTU, Vintech, and Focusrite preamps. We were using a variety of mics and the sound source was a Tacoma acoustic guitar, which has a little different flavor than most acoustics. It was not super clean, but was clean and quiet overall, with a bit of warmth to it. In spite of it not being perfectly clean, it still retained good clarity. with colored mics, like a ribbon and an FET condensor, it became very muddy and overly colored in a hurry - losing definition and clarity. However, it did very well with small and large diaphragm condensers.. It was better suited for the strumming parts than for finger picked parts, as it had a little meat too it but didn't bring out all the nuances in the fingerpicking as well as some of the other preamps tested.Bottom line - not quite as much presence and clarity as I would like for some parts, but overall still a very solid performer on a budget. Keep in mind that 2 of the 3 preamps we were comparing it to were many times the cost of this |
|
|