
Originally Posted by
DAS
The implied difference between duplication and replication is that in duplication you're just using CDR discs to "burn" copies, whereas in replication a glass master is made and discs are manufactured from that master with your data on them. No matter how good the CDR and burning process there is always more margin for error because of the formulas used to make the discs "recordable." So, yes, all other things being equal replicated discs are better, but unless you're doing a run of thousands it's probably not worth it. Duplicated CDR discs, if done well, are almost foolproof these days, and far more economical for small runs.
Bookmarks